Glen Ellyn D41 removes 'Perks of Being a Wallflower' from school shelves
The Chicago Tribune’s article, Glen Ellyn
D41 removes 'Perks of Being a Wallflower' from school shelves, by Quang
Truong talks about how the book, The
Perks of Being a Wallflower, has been removed from classroom libraries in Glen
Ellyn school in District 41. This book was banned because of parent complaints
that stated that this book was inappropriate for 8th graders because
of sexual content and drug usage. The author mentions this at first, but gives
many details to show that he believes that 8th graders, and their
parents, are the ones who need to make decisions about what books they read. He
mentions many parents who have opinions on this book. He quotes them in the
article to support the idea that teens need to be able to choose their own
books. He even quotes a mother who bought a copy for her and her daughter. This
mom argued that books are a good and safe way to encounter “life’s difficult
situations.”
Quang Truong uses craft move to make points
stronger and to make readers think. Truong uses opinions from parents to show
and support his opinion on The Perks of
Being a Wallflower. But the author also includes quotes from people who
oppose it and reasons why they would oppose it. This is just like a
counterclaim. While there is no distinct paragraph from the counterclaim, many
details were sprinkled throughout the article explaining why The Perks of Being a Wallflower if inappropriate
for teens in middle school. He also quotes parents of kids who attend Glen
Ellyn Middle School. These are valuable sources and quotes because they prove a
point and they are real and valid.
You give very well supportive quotes and ideas to your claims but I'd also like to know whether or not if you agree that "The Perks of Being a Wallflower" should be in middle school bookshelves.
ReplyDeleteThis was a really good RR. It made me feel intrigued about the book. You made me understand our point of view. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI like how you list many craft moves in this article and also explained why you think the author used it in the article.
ReplyDelete